Efficacy of 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate versus 4 L polyethylene glycol in split-dose for colonoscopy cleansing in out and inpatient: A multicentre, randomized trial (OVER 2019).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Adequate bowel cleansing is essential for colonoscopy quality. A novel 1 L polyethylene glycol plus ascorbate (1 L PEG+ASC) solution has been recently introduced. Nevertheless, the efficacy of 1 L PEG+ASC as compared to that of high-volume bowel preparation in both inpatients and outpatients is still unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This single-blinded, non-inferiority study randomized patients undergoing colonoscopy to receive split-dose 1 L PEG+ASC or 4 L PEG. The primary endpoint was the overall cleansing success. Secondary endpoints were excellent cleansing and high-quality cleansing of the right colon, as well as lesions detection rate, patient compliance, tolerability and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 478 patients were randomized to 1 L PEG+ASC (N = 236) or 4 L PEG (N = 242). The 1 L PEG+ASC showed higher cleansing success rate (91.8% vs 83.6%; P=0.01) and a high-quality cleansing of the right colon (52.3% and 38.5%; P=0.004) compared to 4 L PEG. Moreover, 1 L PEG+ASC achieved a higher cleansing success in out-patients (96.3%% vs 88.6%; P=0.018), and a similar success rate in the in-patients (84.7% vs 76.7%; P=0.18). Adenoma detection rate, tolerability and incidence of adverse events were comparable between preparations. CONCLUSIONS: The 1 L PEG+ASC showed higher efficacy in achieving adequate colon cleansing compared with 4 L PEG, particularly in the right colon. No differences in the tolerability and safety were detected.

Digital single-operator cholangioscopy in treating difficult biliary stones: results from a multicenter experience.

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice, standard endoscopic treatment of biliary stones fails in up to 10% of patients, and more invasive procedures such as percutaneous trans-hepatic interventions or surgery might become necessary. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study, based on prospectively-collected data, was to evaluate both the efficacy and the safety of digital-single operator cholangioscopy (D-SOC) to treat difficult biliary stones in cases with a previous failure of conventional endoscopic methods. METHODS: Only patients with a previous failure of endoscopic standard treatment and a D-SOC-based biliary stone treatment using electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) or laser lithotripsy (LL) were included. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the stone clearance rate per procedure and per patient. RESULTS: Out of 1258 ERCP performed at our centers, 31 cholangioscopes in 21 patients were solely performed for the treatment of difficult biliary stones using EHL or LL. A complete biliary stone removal was achieved in 67.7% (21/31) of all procedures including initial and repeated examinations, while in 35.4% (11/31) of all procedures an incomplete removal was accomplished of which 36.3% had a partial stone removal. In 22 procedures EHL was adopted as techniques to fragment and remove biliary stones, while in 9 procedures LL was used. In both the techniques, the complete stone removal rate and the incomplete stone removal rate were similar (75% vs. 77.7%, P>0.05). Furthermore, the success rate of digital D-SOC to treat difficult biliary stones was assessed per patient: overall, 100% of patients with difficult biliary stones were successfully treated using D-SOC. Only one patient experienced mild cholangitis classified ad mild adverse event following ASGE (American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy) lexicon. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that digital D-SOC assisted biliary stone treatment is highly efficient for the treatment of difficult biliary stones even in such patients in whom previous conventional endoscopic methods to treat biliary stones have failed. Therefore, D-SOC might be considered the new standard of care for these patients, being both, effective and safe.

Use of catheter-based cholangioscopy in the diagnosis of indeterminate stenosis: a multi-centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Direct bile ducts visualization through cholangioscopy has gained popularity due to its better diagnostic accuracy than a standard ERCP in indeterminate biliary stricture. AIM: We aimed to review our catheter-based cholangioscopy interventions in patients with indeterminate biliary stenosis, using the SpyGlass Direct Visualization System (SDVS) and summarize our experience in terms of procedures and results. RESULTS: we collected 25 consecutive patients with indeterminate biliary stricture over 3 years. The overall procedural success in our cohort amounted to 96% (24/25). If we focus on the diagnostic procedures, the ability to merely visualize the region of interest/lesion and perform biopsy of the lesion was possible in 96 % (24/25) In our cohort localization in the common bile duct (P = 0.03; 95 % CI 0.27-0.96) was found as positive determining factor for diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for visual diagnosis by SDVS in our cohort were 100, 83.3 and 96 %, respectively. The use of biopsy or obtaining a histological diagnosis to assist in identifying patients with malignant stenosis, to exclude malignancy and to correctly classify diagnosed patients resulted in a sensitivity of 100 %, a specificity of 73% % with an overall accuracy of 94.4 %. Only a mild adverse event (cholangitis, treated conservatively) occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Today, the SDVS should be considered essential in diagnosing indeterminate biliary strictures, since the procedure is associated with high procedural success in terms of diagnostic accuracy, alters clinical outcome in over 80 % of considered insolvable cases, with an acceptable safety profile.

[Treatment of biliary lithiasis with the advent of new technologies in Italy in the Lazio and Abruzzo regions over the past 15 years. Comparison between the patient series in a Roman university hospital and in a number of hospitals in the Abruzzo region]. / Il trattamento della litiasi biliare dopo l'avvento delle nuove tecnologie in Italia, nel Lazio ed Abruzzo negli ultimi 15 anni. Confronto tra la casistica di un ospedale universitario romano e alcuni ospedali abruzzesi.

Biliary lithiasis is a disease with a high incidence in the western world and a high social cost. To evaluate the impact of new technologies--mainly laparoscopic cholecystectomy and radiological and endoscopic techniques--in the treatment of biliary lithiasis, a statistical study was conducted on the surgical interventions performed over the past 15 years in Italy in the Lazio and Abruzzo regions. From 1985 to 1999, 150,000 cases of hepatobiliary lithiasis were hospitalized every year in Italy with a mean hospital stay of 7.8 days (13,000 in Lazio and 6,000 in Abruzzo). 100,000 cholecystectomies were performed every year in Italy in public hospitals, 30% of which by conventional laparotomy and 70% laparoscopically. Ten percent of these operations on average were performed in the Lazio region and 3% in the Abruzzo region. 10,615 cases of main bile duct stones were treated in 1999, 6,502 of which by ERCP and the others with open procedures and radiologically. The mortality was 0-0.1% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy as against 0-0.5% in open procedures.